hi maya,
i think perhaps i should have been more specific -- i am already used
to working W2 hourly, as a contractor w/ no benefits. just a flat
hourly rate, and i cover my own insurance.
a new contract job wants to do the same, but go 1099 instead of W2.
apples to apples tho, no benefits, insurance, etc. so im just trying to
figure out the quanitative difference between the two.
all bennies aside, the principle difference between 1099 & W2
contracting is matter of splitting the FICO/Social Securitiy taxes.
this amount is 15.3%, and w/ W2 workers is split between the worker and
the employer. going 1099, you pay all of it.
i think i came to a conclusion in another thread. say youre getting
paid $50/hr 1099, to go W2 (hourly; still no bennies) would be like
this:
1) 50 * (15.3% / 2)
2) 50 * .0765 = 3.8
3) 50 - 3.8 = 46.2
....so 50/hr 1099 is equal to about $46.20/hr W2
as i mentioned tho, i am only trying to figure out the hourly amount,
w/o taking into consideration benefits, vacation, insurance, etc. i am
already a W2 hourly contractor and do not have those things provided
for me.
matt
>> Stay informed about: 1099 vs W2 - diff in hourly rate?